WOW – this is scary stuff…but then so is so much that is covered up…and good reason to cover it up….Dr Holly needles

So this story – has gone viral – but let’s take a look at it…there are several different parts:

  • 1) polio got renamed so that people would not know that it was still around
  • 2) the polio vaccination not only caused polio but also cancer
  • 3) people are getting paid out whose children became autistic due to vaccinations

In addition to Wikipedia, which is a fairly good source of information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SV40

we can go to the sites:

we also have:

and numerous other sites…all sourcing Dr. Michele Carbone, Assistant Professor of Pathology at the Loyola University in Chicago…but before we look at his story…note this piece of information:

Look at what Dr. Suzanne Humphries says:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Twch-T-n8Ns  Polio was renamed as AFP or acute flaccid paralysis to hide the fact that the polio vaccine was spreading polio!!!  This is a very good video to watch explaining how shotty the research on vaccinations is!!!  It also explores the faulty concept of “science” as explored in medical sciences.

SV40 spread far and wide

The pages that were deleted dealt  specifically with the fact that the Simian virus (SV40), which at one time was  exclusive to monkeys, began showing up in polio vaccines in 1960. “Because SV40  was not discovered until 1960, no one was aware in the 1950s that polio vaccine  could be contaminated,” the CDC website explained.

In  fact, it was only discovered, the agency said, purely by  accident:

Soon after its discovery in 1960, SV40 was identified in  polio vaccine. It was found in the injected form of the vaccine (IPV), not the kind given by mouth (OPV). At that time, rhesus monkey kidney  cells, which contain SV40 if the animal is infected, were used in preparing  viral vaccines.

Though the tainted vaccine containing monkey cancer  virus was discovered in 1960, “existing polio  vaccine stocks were not recalled and were used until 1963,” said the deleted  site. That means the agency was, for a period of years, conspicuously dispersing  vaccines containing a possible link to cancer to hundreds of millions of people  in the U.S., UK, Australia and the former Soviet Union.

The website SV40Foundation.org has  more details on just how the vaccine was used following discovery of the cancer  link.

“In 1961, SV40 was discovered by Dr. Bernice Eddy of the National  Institute of Health, Division of Biologics when she took the material used to  grow polio vaccines and injected it into hamsters,” the foundation says on its  website. “Upon the discovery that SV40 was an animal carcinogen  that had found its way into the polio vaccines, a new federal law was passed in  1961 that required that no vaccines contain this virus. However, this law did  not require that SV40 contaminated vaccines be thrown away or that the  contaminated seed material (used to make all polio vaccines for the next four decades) be discarded.  (bold italics mine) As a result, known SV40  contaminated vaccines were injected into children up until 1963.”

Michele  Carbone, a scientist at the Loyola University Medical Center in Chicago,  discovered in 2004 that the Soviet polio vaccine may even have been contaminated  after 1963 – and quite possibly up to the early 1980s, according to the trade  journal New Scientist.

“The vaccine was almost certainly used  throughout the Soviet bloc and probably exported to China, Japan and several  countries in Africa. That means hundreds of millions could have been exposed to  SV40 after 1963,” the report said.  http://www.naturalnews.com/041593_CDC_polio_vaccine_SV40_cancer_virus.html#ixzz2cGMZorvT

But there are other reports and studies that reveal contradictory data…so let’s look at some of them…

1)  The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) states that SV40  was also “present in cancers of people who either had or had not received the  polio vaccine that was contaminated with SV40”

[http://www.chop.edu].

2) The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) also claimed,  “people with cancers who were born after SV40 was no longer a contaminant of the  polio vaccine were found to have evidence for SV40 in their cancerous  cells.”  (could it have been transferred from the mother?)

3) Another quote on the hospital website said:  “Taken together, these findings do not support the hypothesis  that SV40 virus contained in polio vaccines administered before 1963 cause  cancers. In addition, available evidence suggests that SV40 virus is likely be  transmitted to people by a mechanism other than vaccines,”

4) Yet, the National Network for Immunization  Information published a somewhat conflicting report, in 2005, regarding a link between  SV40 and increased cancer rates:
“Although SV40 has biological properties consistent with a  cancer-causing virus, it has not been conclusively established whether it has  caused cancer in humans,” said the report. “Epidemiological studies of groups of  people who received polio vaccine during 1955-1963 do not show an increased  cancer risk.”

However, the same report contradicts  itself also stating: 
“However, a number of studies have found SV40 in certain forms of  cancer in humans, such as mesotheliomas – rare tumors located in the lungs –  brain and bone tumors; the virus has also been found to be associated with some  types of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.”

So let’s go to the actual statistics on some of these vaccinations….What we find is that diseases usually

vaccinationsrun a given life time…note the graph to the side…note where the vaccinations are introduced… usually as the disease is running out, so to speak, that a vaccination is typically introduced.  Further, once the vaccination is introduced, however, a whole constellation of other issues start to show up…

So, we each have to take responsibility and assess, are these vaccinations really what we want to subject ourselves and our children to?  Who is getting the pay off…

I haven’t got all the stats for Canada yet, but since 2008, the US Court of Federal Claims quietly admitted that vaccines, particularly those containing mercury-based preservative Thimerosal, caused autism.

Vaccine damage is undeniable.

On Jan 28, 2013, David Kirby of the Huffington Post broke yet another story of $10 Million dollar payouts in two separate cases of children irreversibly brain-damaged by vaccines.

After various types of denial of clear-cut facts and evidence of vaccine damage, the US Vaccine Injury Compensation Program agreed to the recent awards.  Now don’t forget the amount of stress, anxiety, and frustration these court cases caused the families, never mind having to deal with the fall out of the impact on the child.

The following are a few case examples:

1) a 10-year-old California boy named Ryan Mojabi, the parents proved that all the recommended vaccinations received from 2003-2005, and specifically, measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccines caused a severe and debilitating injury to Ryan’s brain, diagnosed as Autism Spectrum Disorder (‘ASD’).

2) At only 15 months of age, in 2003, little Emily Moller was severely injured by the DtaP vaccine.  The MMR, HiB and Prevnar vaccine were also given at this time.  Emily’s mother fought for justice for 10 years with mountains of evidence of Emily’s seizure disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorder.

3) Health records of both children read like a novel about medieval tortures with long fits of screaming, relentless pain, rashes and fevers, just for starters. Both children were reportedly very bright and considered more advanced for their age prior to vaccination.

It is disturbing to realize, both Canada and USA, that the governments refuse to acknowledge and act on the obvious fact that since vaccines have been forced onto children, we have seen epidemics of autism and brain damage that seem to be linked to nothing but the vaccination programs in both countries – the vaccine damage is irrefutable.  There is just as strong evidence that even though her children may not be vaccinated, if mom had been vaccinated with ‘stealth vaccines’ designed to affect generations, they too may well suffer serious health problems. 

You can understand why these reports are being kept quiet…records were sealed that might help warn many more families against vaccinating their children.  In fact Kirby reported that in Emily’s case once the Judge became convinced Emily would win, the Judge was angry and felt forced into a corner saying : “Emily has autism, and I don’t want to give other families who filed autism claims any hope.”

Did you know that over $2.3 Billion has been quietly paid out in vaccine-related damages between 1989-2013 in the US alone.  Many more cases were dismissed, thus those families were left to deal with the fall-out of vaccine programs the governments of both countries still embrace despite the carnage.

Autism Speaks Canada has a site that says:  “Autism statistics from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identify around 1 in 88 children as diagnosed with autism (Mar 2012) – a ten-fold increase in prevalence in 40 years…”  The site adds:  “The 2012 numbers reflect a 78% increase in reported prevalence in the last 6 years and Autism prevalence figures are growing.”  To what extent is this a reflection of vaccinations?

Are you willing to do to help change the government’s policy of forcing vaccines on it’s unsuspecting citizens at the behest of drug companies who deny and blame to avoid being responsible for autism and other vaccine damage?

Be responsible, do your research, find a good health practitioner.

Here’s to your health!

For more information, contact: Dr Holly at holly@choicesunlimited.ca

Copyright 2013 © Choices Unlimited for Health & Wellness

Disclaimer: This site is provided for general information only, and is not a substitute for the medical advice of your own doctor or other health care professional. This site is not responsible or liable for any diagnosis made by a user based on the content of this website. This site is not liable for the contents of any external internet sites listed, nor does it endorse any commercial product or service mentioned or advised on any of such sites. Always consult your own health care practitioner.